When reading the Lightbown and Spada chapter, I found that a few of the proposals reminded me of my learning in high school, which was not incredibly successful. The "Get it right in the end" proposal seemed to be like the most effective way to teach, in my mind. It's important to remember that some things are more difficult to teach than others and will just take time for the student to acquire. This was the case for me in French when I was learning the genders of nouns. It's memorization and practice and new because we don't have an equivalent in English. I think when students don't have the equivalent in their own language, it takes more time for the learner to acquire it. Interlanguage can change depending on the student's focus. It's important to teach in a way that creates memorable experiences so that the students can alter their interlanguage and learn from errors and successes.
I found your post this week to be very fruitful: "It's important to teach in a way that creates memorable experiences so that the students can alter their interlanguage and learn from errors and successes." This takes on the more active role in learning by learn by doing instead of by being passive which plays upon our idea that language is more than just acquired. The sociopragmatics of any language cannot be learned in a book or by observation, students have to get dirty and feel confident enough to try them out. Maybe what makes a learning experience memorable is a student's ability to feel confident within his or her setting.
ReplyDelete